Legal Opinion

Bright v. Ashcroft

District Court, M.D. Louisiana

Decided February 11, 2003No. CIV.A. 02-1225PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REASONS

FELDMAN, District Judge.

Before the Court are plaintiff Dan L. Bright’s Motion to Strike portions of Scott A. Hodes’s affidavit, and defendant Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Motion for Summary Judgment. For the following reasons, the motion to strike is GRANTED, and the motion for summary judgment is DENIED.

I. BACKGROUND

Dan Bright was convicted of murder in Orleans Parish in July 1996. Prior to his post-conviction hearing, Bright filed Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act requests with the FBI’s New Orleans field office. 1 Although the FBI acknowledged that it…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Campbell v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  4. Cynthia King v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  5. Salas v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
  2. Amedee v. Shell Chem. LPDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2019
  3. Evans v. U.S. Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2015
  4. XL Specialty Insurance v. Bollinger Shipyards, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2014
  5. Cain v. Exxon Mobile CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API