Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Norris

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 13, 1871PublishedCited by 3 opinions

CASE 18 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL PROM BRACKEN CIRCUIT COURT. CITED 3 Metcalfe, —, Messick v. Ray. CITED 6 Bush, 698, Weil & Brother v. Silverstone.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Pryor

The instructions given by the court below were substantially correct. The court told the jury, in an instruction given in lien of the instructions asked for by appellant’s counsel, “ that, if James Norris received the tobacco, as a commission-merchant or shipper, to sell for the plaintiff, and that he sold' the tobacco or authorized the defendants to sell it, and it was sold by the defendants and the money paid by them to James Norris, they must find for the defendants, unless they find that *520the defendants had notice before said jDayment to pay the same to plaintiff.” This instruction…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Weil v. SilverstoneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1869

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jonas v. South Covington & Cincinnati Street Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Jonas v. South Covington & Cincinnati Street Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Pfaffinger v. KremerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API