Legal Opinion

Weil v. Silverstone

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 1, 1869PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Case 111 — PETITION EQUITY — CITED 1 Story’s Equity, sec. 623. 1 Str. 505, Armory v. Dalamiiie. 15 Yesey, 432, Lupton v. White. 2 Yesey & B. 265. 2 Blackstone, 405. 2 Kent, 365. 2 Johnson’s Chancery, Hart v. Ten Eyck.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE HARDIN

delivered the opinion of the court.

The judgment for revision on this appeal was rendered upon the finding of a jury, for the defendants, in several consolidated actions, prosecuted by the appellants on demands against Isaac Lipman, with attachments, under which they sought to subject to their debts a stock of dry goods which were claimed by the appellee J. Silver-stone, whose asserted claim presented the principal issue tried by the jury.

It is not controverted that Lipman at one time owned a stock of goods at Hickman, Kentucky, where he was engaged in merchandising, and sold, or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Treat v. BarberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1828
  2. Smead, Collard & Hughes v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1855

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. The "Idaho."Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Lightner Mining Co. v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Imboden v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Ess v. GriffithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  5. Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. GreenDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API