Legal Opinion
In Re the Vacation of a Portion of MacKrill's Addition to Wall
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 1, 1970No. File 10770PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RENTTO, Judge.
While this proceeding is entitled as seeking the vacation of a portion of the plat of an addition to a townsite it is, in effect, one seeking the vacation of a portion of a street. After a hearing at which petitioners and objectors were heard, the city not appearing, the court denied the relief requested. Petitioners appeal.
The plat of the addition involved was duly filed June 23, 1910. In April of the following year the governing board of the town, now city, of Wall, South Dakota, by resolution approved it and declared the area annexed to and made a part of the town. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- County School Board v. Cottonwood School District No. 41South Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- Middle Creek School District No. 18 v. Butte County Board of EducationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Janssen v. TushaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
- Mellette County v. ArnoldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
- Edmunds v. PlianosSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kreager v. First National Bank of the Black HillsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- State Bank of Burleigh County Trust Co. v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- City of Belle Fourche v. DittmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Black v. GardnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Black v. GardnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.