Legal Opinion

Mellette County v. Arnold

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1956No. File 9408PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, P. J.

The complaint is in the usual form in a statutory action to determine adverse claims to real property. It alleges that Mellette County is the owner in fee of the twenty-five tracts described in the complaint. Plaintiff prays that defendants be required to set forth all their adverse claims to the land; that defendants be decreed to have no interest or estate in, or lien or encumbrance upon, said land; that title be quieted in the plaintiff; and that defendants be forever barred from asserting any interest or estate therein.

The defendants Thomas Arnold, Edward M. Arnold, Frances Mullen and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Union Bank of Richmond v. Commissioners of OxfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Lawrence Manufacturing Co. v. Janesville Cotton MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Green v. Hutsonville Township High School District No. 201Illinois Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Missouri River Telephone Co. v. City of MitchellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Warren v. County of StantonNebraska Supreme Court · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Shannon v. SponburghWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Montgomery County v. REVERE NATIONAL CORP., INC.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. In Re the Vacation of a Portion of MacKrill's Addition to WallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  4. HARDING COUNTY, SD v. FrithiofCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  5. Gruwell v. HindsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API