Mellette County v. Arnold
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, P. J.
The complaint is in the usual form in a statutory action to determine adverse claims to real property. It alleges that Mellette County is the owner in fee of the twenty-five tracts described in the complaint. Plaintiff prays that defendants be required to set forth all their adverse claims to the land; that defendants be decreed to have no interest or estate in, or lien or encumbrance upon, said land; that title be quieted in the plaintiff; and that defendants be forever barred from asserting any interest or estate therein.
The defendants Thomas Arnold, Edward M. Arnold, Frances Mullen and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Union Bank of Richmond v. Commissioners of OxfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Lawrence Manufacturing Co. v. Janesville Cotton MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Green v. Hutsonville Township High School District No. 201Illinois Supreme Court · 1934
- Missouri River Telephone Co. v. City of MitchellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
- Warren v. County of StantonNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Shannon v. SponburghWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Montgomery County v. REVERE NATIONAL CORP., INC.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- In Re the Vacation of a Portion of MacKrill's Addition to WallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- HARDING COUNTY, SD v. FrithiofCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Gruwell v. HindsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.