United States v. Fei Ye, AKA Ye Fei Ming Zhong, AKA Zhong Ming AKA Andy Zhong
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge.
Defendants are charged with possessing stolen trade secrets in violation of the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (“EEA”), 18 U.S.C. § 1831 et seq. The district court granted defendants’ motion for pre-trial depositions of several expert witnesses whom the government intends to call at trial. The government brings this interlocutory appeal under 18 U.S.C. § 1835, arguing that the district court erred in granting the motion because the order authorizes and directs the disclosure of trade secrets, and because it is inconsistent with the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Freeman v. Directv, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. WR GraceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Kansas Medical Mutual Insurance v. SvatySupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Tahara v. Matson Terminals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Henson v. United States District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.