Legal Opinion

Martin, Trustee v. Steinke

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPardee, P. J.

The parties stand in this court as they did in the court below. The plaintiff is the duly appointed and qualified trustee in bankruptcy of the Greenwich Rubber Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Ohio. The plaintiff alleged in his petition that said corporation was organized with an authorized capital stock of $250,000, the par value of its shares being $100 each, that on the second day of August, 1920, the defendant, with others, became subscribers to the capital stock of said company, that the defendant signed, executed, and delivered a written…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. PowersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  2. Gilman v. GrossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Tonica & Petersburg Railroad v. SteinIllinois Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sparhawk v. GorhamOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Rhoades v. McDowellOhio Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Austin v. SoucekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Joseph Turk Mfg. Co. v. Singer Steel Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1951
  5. Marden Rehab. Servs., Inc. v. E. Liverpool Convalescent Ctr., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API