Legal Opinion

Austin v. Soucek

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 20, 1928No. 18664PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, C.

The essential facts in the case are as follows: The defendant, C. H. Soucek, during the years 1910, 1911, and 1912, tem porarily resided at or near El Campo, Tax., wliere he taught school and worked on a rice plantation. In 1912 a man named Marshall organized a bank at El Campo, Tex., which institution was styled the “Citizens State Bank of El Campo.” At or about the time of its organization, the defendant was induced to purchase some stock in this bank, immediately thereafter the defendant removed from the state of Texas to his farm in Grant county, Okla. This bank was a one-man…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Handley v. StutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Harn v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Turner v. Grangers' Life & Health InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  4. People v. California Safe Deposit & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912
  5. Beal v. DillonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API