Legal Opinion

Rhoades v. McDowell

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1927No. 1192PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPardee, J.

Blake McDowell as receiver for the Akron Prospect Company, commenced this action in the Summit Common Pleas to recover on the unpaid balance due upon a stock subscription made by J. Perry Rhoades to .the Company. Said cause was presented to the trial court upon the amended petition of McDowell, the amended answer and cross petition of Rhoades, and the reply of McDowell.

McDowell alleged said Company was insolvent and that its assets consisted only of Rhoades’ and others unpaid stock subscriptions, and that it was necessary to collect such money due thereon to pay debts.

Rhoades in his amended…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Martin, Trustee v. SteinkeOhio Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Hopping v. Dr. L. D. Le Gear Medicine Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Vaught v. VaughtOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Ewing v. Pioneer National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  3. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., L.L.C. v. VanLeeuwenOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Biggs v. Bernard, Exr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. Stange, Admr. v. Campbell Admr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API