Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Herriott v. Herriott

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided March 20, 2019No. B287997PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStratton, J.

INTRODUCTION

A divorced, elderly couple-Paul and Alicja-continued to reside in the same building after dissolving their marriage.1 Since then, the former spouses have a documented history of legal actions, complaints, and issues against one another. Each requested a restraining order against the other in connection with overlapping events and/or incidents. After concluding trial on both parties' requests for restraining orders, the trial court granted both, with certain modifications.

Paul, in propria persona, appeals from the restraining order issued against him, and argues the trial court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Small v. Fritz Companies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In Re Marriage of BondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Bullock v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. In Re DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Topanga and Victory Partners v. ToghiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tanguilig v. Valdez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Butler v. Fanara CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. Marriage of Jenkins CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Tanguilig v. ValdezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  5. Thomas v. Blue CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API