Lake v. Ingham
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
The facts in this case will sufficiently appear from the following opinion of the Court pronounced by
Paddock, J.
This action is predicated upon a judgement which was recovered in Coos county, in the state of N. Hampshire, Nov. 1823, for $82,49 damages, and $142,43 cost; which judgement was afterwards prosecuted in and ruled from this Court to referees in July term, 1829, who have reported that the defendant ought to recover his costs. To the acceptance of the report the plaintiff by his attorney,Samuel A. Pearson, has filed exceptions. It appears that about the time the judgment vpas recovered…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Northrup v. HaywardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Bell v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
- Hooper v. WelchSupreme Court of Vermont · 1870
- Braden v. WardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1880
- Bell v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.