Braden v. Ward
Supreme Court of New Jersey
This cause is before the court upon return to a rule to show cause why an order should not be made prohibiting the assignment or satisfaction of a certain judgment in this court, until one-third of the amount of said judgment shall have been paid to John C. Lee and John M. Brown. . The facts upon which the order is asked, will appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Reed, J.
Samuel Braden had been, previous to 1874, employed as a laborer in putting down iron water-pipes, in the city of Toledo. His employers were Ward & Rutherford. While so employed, Braden was injured. He employed the firm of Lee, Brown & Hueston, lawyers practicing at Toledo, 10 bring an action. The result was a judgment in the Court wf Common Pleas of Lucas county, Ohio, in favor of Braden, against Ward & Rutherford, for the sum of $1500, with $263.05 costs of suit; $209 was realized upon execution, which was applied to a part payment of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Marshall v. . MeechNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Martin v. HawksNew York Supreme Court · 1818
- Forsythe v. BeveridgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
- Stearns v. TappinThe Superior Court of New York City · 1856
- Gilleland v. FailingNew York Supreme Court · 1848
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nemtin v. ZarinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1983
- Kramer v. Alston (In Re Alston)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2005