Legal Opinion

Agrivar, LLC v. Daryl Basham

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided May 26, 2026No. 4:25-cv-04253Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION AGRIVAR, LLC, 4:25-CR-04253-KES Plaintiff, vs. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS DARYL BASHAM, Defendant. Defendant, Daryl Basham, moves to dismiss the complaint filed by plaintiff, AgriVaR, LLC, asserting that the complaint violates the abstention doctrine set forth in Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. United States,

424 U.S. 800

(1976). Docket 14; Docket 16. AgriVaR has responded, Docket 17, and Basham replied, Docket 18. The court issues the following order. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND The court considers…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Miller v. Redwood Toxicology Laboratory, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API