Legal Opinion

Schoerken v. Swift & Courtney & Beecher Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided April 28, 1881PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the Court

Wheeler, D. J.

This suit is brought upon letters patent of the United States No. 63,104, dated March 19, 1867, and issued to the orator, for a match-box. Among the defences set up in the answer is one that the same invention had been previously patented in letters patent of France No. 52,907, dated February 6, 1862, and a certificate of addition thereto, dated April 29, 1864, granted and issued to one Caussemille. The orator’s invention is not shown earlier than the patent. The defendant ha's filed in evidence what purports to be a copy of the patent set up in the answer, certifiéd from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Church v. HubbartSupreme Court of the United States · 1804
  2. De Florez v. RaynoldsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1880

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carter Products, Inc. v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1955
  2. Application of Bo Thuresson Af EkenstamCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  3. Tolfree v. WetzlerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1927
  4. Ireson v. PierceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1889
  5. Gallagher v. De Lancey Stables Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API