Legal Opinion

Hitchcock v. McMinnville City Council

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 18, 1980No. 35510, CA 15804PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, P.J.

This is an appeal from an order granting intervenor’s motion to dismiss a petition for writ of review by which petitioner sought to challenge a decision by the McMinnville City Council (Council) on a zone change application. The motion was granted on the grounds that the petition for review had not been timely filed within the 60-day statutory limit (ORS 34.030)1 and that petitioner lacked standing to challenge the decision.2 We affirm.

In February, 1978, petitioner petitioned the Council to act on its own motion to rezone certain property from commercial to a less intensive use. A portion of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Duddles v. City Council of West LinnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  2. Heilman v. City of RoseburgCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. Huffman v. YerkovichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hitchcock v. McMinnville City CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Lyford v. BOARD OF COM'RS FOR BENTONCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API