Legal Opinion

Feibus & Co. v. Godley Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 4, 1979No. 7926SC233PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

The record, together with the briefs, presents to this Court a lengthy set of documents for consideration. However, although three causes of action are alleged and eight questions presented for consideration, the conclusions of law follow well accepted principles.

The defendant moved for summary judgment under Rule 56, together with a motion to strike portions of plaintiff’s affidavits. The motion was denied by Judge Robert Kirby, who directed plaintiff’s counsel to reduce the denial to a written order and address it to his home in Cherryville for signature. The session of court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. North Carolina State Ports Authority v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Jewell v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Hampton Guano Co. v. Hill Live-Stock Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Sellers v. Friedrich Refrigerators, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Leggett Electric Co. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Feibus & Co., Inc. v. Godley Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API