Legal Opinion
United States v. Rockwell International Corp.
United States Court of International Trade
Decided January 22, 1986No. 82-12-01744PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
DiCARLO, Judge:
The United States brings this action against defendant Rockwell International Corporation (Rockwell) to recover a civil penalty for alleged negligent violations of section 592 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1592 (1982). The complaint alleges that 223 entries of nickel cadium batteries imported from Mexico over a one year period were entered by means of material and false statement and by means of material omissions.
Rockwell moves under Rule 56 of the Rules of this Court for summary judgment on the material and false statement and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sinclair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Carlos and Jacqueline Marcello v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Joseph, Jr. And Anastasia Marcello v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- George v. Zmuda and Walburga Zmuda v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Leo C. Gonzales v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- United States v. Moody Aubrey TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. Thorson Chemical Corp.United States Court of International Trade · 1992
- United States v. Hitachi America, Ltd.United States Court of International Trade · 1997
- United States v. Menard, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 1992
- United States v. Daewoo International (America) Corp.United States Court of International Trade · 1988
- United States v. Modes, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.