Estate of Mervin G. Pierpont, Deceased, Union Trust Company of Maryland and Ernest L. Poyner, Executors v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
J. SPENCER BELL, Circuit Judge:
The Estate of Mervin G. Pierpont petitions for review of the Tax Court’s decision that the estate was not entitled to a marital deduction with respect to a testamentary trust. The Tax Court concluded that the power granted by Pier-pont’s will to the life beneficiary, his wife-,, Lallah R. Pierpont, did not constitute-, under Maryland law, a power to appoint the corpus of the trust to her estate-within the meaning of § 2056(b) (5> of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. The language employed in creating the-Lallah R. Pierpont Trust, quoted below; makes it clear…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Blair v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Morgan v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Helvering v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Aerojet-General Corp. v. AskewCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Putnam v. PutnamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Old Kent Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
- Bosch v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.