Legal Opinion
Maxine Dakil, Individually and as of the Estate of Louis N. Dakil, Deceased, and Cross-Appellee v. United States of America, and Cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 6, 1974No. 73-1607 and 73-1608PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
Dr. Louis N. Dakil and his wife Maxine sued for a refund of federal income taxes and the government counterclaimed for additional taxes and fraud penalties. Dr. Dakil died during pendency of the suit and his wife was named executrix of his estate. The case was tried to a jury and on the basis of its answers to special interrogatories the court entered judgment against the executrix in the amount of $28,386.04 ($17,574.11 as taxes and $10,811.93 as penalties). The court rejected the request of the government for judgment against Maxine Dakil individually for the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- William A. George v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Cecil Thompson, Cecil Thompson, Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Wonnacott v. Denver & Rio Grande Western R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
3Cited by23 opinions
- Bettye A. Sanders v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Busse v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Mitchell, Herbert v. Cmsnr IRSCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Clinton O. McMullin McMullin Family Trust, and Laura J. McMullinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Biller v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.