United States v. Cecil Thompson, Cecil Thompson, Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PICKETT, Circuit Judge.
Income tax deficiencies, including a 50% fraud penalty, were assessed against the plaintiff-taxpayer for the years 1942, 1943, 1944 and 1945. The deficiencies in dispute were paid and, after a claim for refund was denied, this action was brought to recover part of the amount assessed. 1 The complaint alleges that the taxpayer was free from fraud and the answer sets forth as an affirmative defense that the deficiencies assessed were due in whole or in part to the fraud of the taxpayer with intent to evade tax. The case was tried to a jury which returned a special verdict…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Stone v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Grace M. Powell, of the Estate of O. E. Powell, Deceased v. Ralph C. Granquist, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Aguayo v. AMCO InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- Ruidoso Racing Association, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- De La Rosa v. Reliable, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Robert P. Lord, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Sibyl Herrington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.