Legal Opinion
Toy v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 30, 2002No. Civil Action 00-0929 (RMU)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Plaintiff’s and the Defendants’ Respective Motions for Summary Judgment
I. INTRODUCTION
This case comes before the court after having been remanded to the Foreign Service Grievance Board (“FSGB”) for further review and proceedings consistent with the court’s December 7, 2000 order directing that the FSGB clearly articulate its findings of fact and analysis of precedent when reaching its decision to refuse to remove the plaintiffs negative employee evaluation report (“EER”) from the plaintiffs personnel file. The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Northwestern University v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Olson v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Aragon v. TillersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Morin v. SSADistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2011
- Ault v. SSADistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.