Legal Opinion
Rose v. Lelande
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 24, 1911No. Civ. No. 1070PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This application must be denied for two reasons: First, there is no duty devolving by law upon the clerk to certify or attest the transcript containing the reporter's notes, or the papers desired to be included therein, not included in the judgment-roll. Second, the notice of appeal is from an order of court setting aside a default. This is not an appealable order.
The writ is denied.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Hughson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Omaha Structural Steel Works v. LemonIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
- Mercantile Banking Co. v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Vázquez-Prada v. King Vda. de DooleySupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1941
- Mercantile Banking Co. v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931