Legal Opinion

CITIZENS LEGAL ENFORCEMENT & RESTORATION v. Connor

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 11, 2011No. Case 06-CV-2368 JLS (WMC)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER: (1) GRANTING RECLAMATION’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. No. 80) AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S CROSS-MOTION (Doc. No. 83); (3) DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS AGAINST PYID; (4) DENYING AS MOOT PVID’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. No. 82) AND PLAINTIFF’S CROSS-MOTION (Doc. No. 87); (5) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART RECLAMATION’S MOTION TO STRIKE (Doc. No. 98); AND (6) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PVID’S DAUBERT MOTION (Doc. No. 95)

JANIS L. SAMMARTINO, District Judge.

Presently before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment by all parties (Doc. Nos. 80, 82, 83,…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Emberton v. San Francisco City GovernmentDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
  2. Emberton v. San Francisco City GovernmentDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API