CITIZENS LEGAL ENFORCEMENT & RESTORATION v. Connor
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER: (1) GRANTING RECLAMATION’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. No. 80) AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S CROSS-MOTION (Doc. No. 83); (3) DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS AGAINST PYID; (4) DENYING AS MOOT PVID’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. No. 82) AND PLAINTIFF’S CROSS-MOTION (Doc. No. 87); (5) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART RECLAMATION’S MOTION TO STRIKE (Doc. No. 98); AND (6) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PVID’S DAUBERT MOTION (Doc. No. 95)
JANIS L. SAMMARTINO, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment by all parties (Doc. Nos. 80, 82, 83,…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Emberton v. San Francisco City GovernmentDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Emberton v. San Francisco City GovernmentDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023