Legal Opinion
Laycock v. Hidalgo County Water Control & Improvement Dist. No. 12
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 19, 1944No. 10614PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
• Alleging that they were the owners by purchase from one Shumate of a judgment he had obtained against the defendant, Hidalgo County Water Control and Improvement District No. 12, on coupons attached to interim bonds issued by the District on April 10, 1930, plaintiffs brought this suit on November 7, 1937. .Elaborately setting out the creation of the district, the voting and issuance of construction bonds, the issuance of interim bonds, the purchase by plaintiffs of the Shumate judgment, the failure of the district and its directors to perform and cause to be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. McLennan v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Commissioners of Taxing Dist. of Brownsville v. LoagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- United States Ex Rel. Turner v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Miller v. State ex rel. AbneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Drainage Dist. No. 4 of Dunklin County v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Albert H. Carter v. Robert Seamans, Jr., as Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Jill Brown v. Bryan County, OkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Stolberg v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- United States v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Department of Public Welfare v. Town of BillericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.