Ronnie Moore, Jr. v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Circuit Judge.
Ronnie Moore Jr. applied for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. An administrative law judge (ALJ) found Moore was not disabled because he could perform jobs a vocational expert (VE) identified in response to a hypothetical posed by the ALJ. The Social Security Appeals Council denied his request for review, and the district court affirmed. On appeal, Moore argues that the ALJ failed to resolve an apparent conflict between the physical limitations described by the ALJ in his hypothetical and the requirements of the jobs the VE…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jones v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Terri Anderson v. Michael J. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Vickie Kemp v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Richard Welsh v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
3Cited by112 opinions
- Jeffrey Pearson v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Lindell Washington v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- Amy Thomas v. Nancy A. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Darren Lamear v. Nancy BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Christopher Stanton v. Commissioner, Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.