Bayer Cropscience Ag v. Dow Agrosciences LLC
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STOLL, Circuit Judge.
Bayer appeals the district court’s award of attorney fees to Dow under 35 U.S.C. § 285. The district court awarded attorney fees to Dow upon finding that the case stood out from others and was thus exceptional. Because the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding the case exceptional and awarding fees, we affirm.
Background
This is the second appeal to our court in this patent infringement lawsuit between plaintiffs-appellants Bayer CropScience AG and Bayer S.A.S. (collectively, “Bayer”) and defendant-appellee Dow AgroSci-ences LLC. The patents-in-suit relate…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Sri Int'l, Inc. v. Cisco Sys., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Energy Heating, LLC. v. Heat On-The-Fly, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Thermolife International LLC v. Gnc CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Rembrandt Techs., LP v. Comcast of Fla./Pa., LP (In Re Rembrandt Techs. LP)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Munchkin, Inc. v. Luv N' Care, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.