Legal Opinion

Phelan v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1950No. S. F. 17884Published

1Opinion of the Court

35 Cal.2d 363 (1950)

WILLIAM PHELAN, Petitioner,

v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Respondents.

S. F. No. 17884.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

May 9, 1950.

Hallinan, MacInnis & Zamloch and Ralph Wertheimer for Petitioner.

Dion R. Holm, City Attorney, and Joseph F. Murphy, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondents.

GIBSON, C.J.

Petitioner recovered a judgment against George O'Brien in the sum of $2,000 pursuant to a jury's verdict in an action for personal injuries. On O'Brien's motion for a new trial the following order was made: "Motion for new trial denied.…

2Cases cited101 opinions

  1. Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Akley v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Holtum v. GriefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API