Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gudvangen v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 7, 1979No. 48045Published

1DissentOtis, Justice

Following en banc reargument I am persuaded the trial court should be affirmed in this appeal.

The plaintiff Wilbur Gudvangen has brought this action against the defendant Austin Mutual, the insurer of plaintiff and his family, to recover uninsured motorist benefits under a policy which covers plaintiff’s two automobiles, neither of which was involved in this accident. Gail Gudvangen, plaintiff’s daughter, was injured on August 17, 1975, while riding as a passenger on an uninsured motorcycle which collided with an uninsured automobile and another uninsured motorcycle.

*818The policy issued by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nygaard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. Martinco v. HastingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  3. Goenen v. SchroederSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1863
  4. Northland Insurance Company v. WestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  5. Halverson v. RolvaagSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API