Legal Opinion

Moskell v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 17, 1951No. 873Published

1Opinion of the CourtPhillips, J.

In this opinion the parties will be called plaintiff and defendant.

Defendant,- the Industrial Commission of Ohio, appealed to this court on questions of law from a judgment of tlje Court of Common Pleas entered upon a finding of a judge of that court (to whom the cause •was submitted by agreement of counsel) in favor of plaintiff, on plaintiff’s appeal to that court from defendant’s order denying plaintiff the right, on rehearing of his claim, to participate in the workmen’s compensation fund of Ohio on the ground that “proof of record fails to show that claimant’s disability is the result of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Malone v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Sebek v. Cleveland Graphite Bronze Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Industrial Commission v. FrankenOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Kaiser v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Maynard v. B. F. Goodrich Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API