Legal Opinion
Stephen L. Langlie v. Onan Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 2, 1999No. 98-3638PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOKEN, Circuit Judge.
In late 1995, Onan Corporation implemented a reduction in force and eliminated the position of Stephen L. Langlie, a 62-year-old employee. Langlie commenced this action, alleging unlawful age discrimination and retaliation. After trial, a jury found that Langlie was not discharged on account of his age, and the district court 1 found insufficient evidence of unlawful retaliation. Langlie appeals, arguing there was overwhelming evidence of age discrimination and retaliation for his years of informal protests against adverse changes in Onan’s pension plan benefits. He also…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- C. Thomas RYTHER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KARE 11, an NBC Affiliate; Gannett Co., Inc., Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Earl HOLLEY, Appellee, v. SANYO MANUFACTURING, INC., AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Rath v. Selection Research, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Oscar L. THOMAS; Janet Kay Bridges; Jay Harbison, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF WYNNE, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Donald Shrable v. Eaton CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- McBryde v. Ritenour School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Selmon v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- Robinson v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2000
- Thomas v. Oregon Fruit Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.