Legal Opinion

State v. Holly

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 8, 1999No. Case Nos. CA99-01-002, CA99-02-020PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Powell, Presiding Judge.

In this consolidated appeal, defendants-appellants, Kimberly R. Holly and Andrew M. Riffe, appeal their convictions in the Clermont County Municipal Court for driving under the influence of alcohol (“DUI”). Because we find that the trial court correctly denied appellants’ motions to suppress, we affirm.

Appellants were arrested and charged on separate occasions with driving under the influence of alcohol in violation of R.C. 4511.19(A)(1) and driving with a prohibited breath-alcohol concentration in violation of R.C. 4511.19(A)(3). 1 Upon their arrests, both appellants…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. FanningOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. City of Defiance v. KretzOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. PlummerOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. AldridgeOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. State v. WhiteOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API