Legal Opinion
Loengard v. Santa Fe Industries, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided September 15, 1987PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Hancock, Jr., J.
Plaintiffs were minority stockholders in Kirby Lumber Corp. on July 31, 1974 when Santa Fe Resources effected a Dela*265ware short-form, freeze-out merger (Delaware Corporation Law § 253) as a result of which Kirby became a wholly owned subsidiary of Santa Fe Industries, Inc. (a detailed statement of the facts and procedural history of this case is set forth in Green v Santa Fe Indus., 70 NY2d 244 [decided herewith]). After unsuccessful motions for class certification in the Green litigation (Green v Santa Fe Indus., 391 F Supp 849 [SD NY 1975] , affd in part…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Enco Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- CPC International Inc. v. McKessonNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Green v. Santa Fe Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Kaufman v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Cooper v. ParskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- IDT Corp. v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Golden Pacific Bancorp, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Caronia v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.