Stewart v. Corrigan
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 97 Ohio St.3d 80.] STEWART, APPELLANT, v. CORRIGAN, JUDGE, APPELLEE. [Cite as Stewart v. Corrigan,
2002-Ohio-5316.] Mandamus sought to compel common pleas court judge to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law on relator’s second petition for postconviction relief—Court of appeals’ denial of writ affirmed. (No. 2002-0758—Submitted August 27, 2002—Decided October 16, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 80639. __________________ Per Curiam. {¶1} On December 18, 2001, appellant, Larry D. Stewart,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Carroll v. CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State ex rel. White v. MackOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Stewart v. CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. White v. SusterOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. White v. SusterOhio Supreme Court · 2002
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Miller v. BradyOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- State Ex Rel. Tremmel v. Erie County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- State ex rel. Rose v. McGintyOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- State ex rel. Schmidt v. School Employees Retirement SystemOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- State Ex Rel. Beach v. Vilkas, Unpublished Decision (8-29-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005