Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Corrigan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 2002No. 2002-0758PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} On December 18, 2001, appellant, Larry D. Stewart, filed a complaint in the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, requesting a writ of mandamus to compel appellee, Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Judge Daniel O. Corri-gan, to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law on Stewart’s second petition for postconviction relief. Judge Corrigan filed an answer, and both parties filed motions for summary judgment.

{¶ 2} On April 11, 2002, the court of appeals granted Judge Corrigan’s motion for summary judgment and denied the writ. The court of appeals reasoned that Stewart was not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Carroll v. CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State ex rel. White v. MackOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State ex rel. White v. SusterOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State ex rel. White v. SusterOhio Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Miller v. BradyOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State Ex Rel. Tremmel v. Erie County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State ex rel. Rose v. McGintyOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State ex rel. Schmidt v. School Employees Retirement SystemOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Stewart v. CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API