Legal Opinion

People v. Monroe

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1981PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The issue presented on this appeal is whether defendant was deprived of effective assistance of counsel by reason of his attorney’s joint representation of both defendant and his codefendant in negotiating a plea bargaining agreement. While we hold today that in accepting a guilty plea from a jointly represented defendant, the court must act to safeguard a defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel, we conclude, on the facts of this case, that defendant has not established that a significant possibility of a conflict of interest existed as to warrant a reversal…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. People v. GombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. MacerolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

4Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. KonstantinidesNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. People v. RecuperoNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. People v. WinklerNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. People v. SalcedoNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API