Legal Opinion
People v. Konstantinides
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 17, 2009No. 198PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Read, J.
Defendant George Konstantinides contends that he is entitled *5to a new trial because he was deprived of his right to conflict-free representation. At a minimum, he argues, his sentence should be vacated because Supreme Court did not hold a hearing to determine the constitutionality of one of two prior felony convictions. For the reasons that follow, we reject both claims, and uphold defendant’s conviction and sentence.
I
Defendant violated the conditions of his parole in 2003, which sparked issuance of a warrant for his arrest in June of that year. According to the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. GombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. KanNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- United States v. Cortland Bay Fulton, Also Known as Tairu Owolabi Alabi, Cortland Bay Fulton v. Warden, Ray Brook Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- People v. CarncrossNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. SanchezNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- People v. SolomonNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- People v. RussellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. SanchezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.