Legal Opinion

Atlantic Lighterage Corp. v. Continental Ins.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 6, 1934No. 13938Published

1Opinion of the Court

BYERS, District Judge.

In this cause in personam, the libelant seeks to recover from its insurer the amount which it has paid in settlement of personal injury claims, and incurred for counsel fees, in connection with damage to the covered barge Harry in tow of the tug Dixie, as stated in (C. C. A.) 57 F.(2d) 184.

The claims were made by Mrs. Turner, wife of the captain of the Harry, and by him for her medical expense, etc., as the alleged result of the striking of the barge by the Herkimer. Both the latter vessel and the Dixie were held at fault in the collision cause.

This respondent insured…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. General Tire Co. of Minneapolis v. Standard Acc. Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  2. Empire State Surety Co. v. Pacific Nat. Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
  3. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp. v. Chicago & Big Muddy Coal & Coke Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1905
  4. Meyers v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  5. Soeller v. New York Canal & Great Lakes Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API