Legal Opinion

Knox Creek Coal Corporation v. Secretary of Labor

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 21, 2016No. 14-2313PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Petition for review denied by published opinion. Judge WYNN wrote the opinion, in which Judge MOTZ and Senior Judge DAVIS joined.

WYNN, Circuit Judge:

The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (the “Commission”) determined that four uncontested violations of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the “Mine Act”) by Knox Creek Coal Corporation (“Knox Creek”) were “significant and substantial” under 30 U.S.C. § 814(d)(1). Three violations were so-called “permissibility” violations, involving inadequately sealed enclosures of electrical equipment, and one was an “accumulations”…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. King v. BurwellSupreme Court of the United States · 2015

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sierra Club v. U.S. Dep't of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  2. Robert Thomas v. Calportland CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  3. Sierra Club v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  4. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic v. PDR Network, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  5. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API