Polkinghorn v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
Decision was heretofore made in this cause and a rehearing thereafter granted. The rehearing was ordered because of the contention of appellant that certain of the points relied upon for reversal were not treated of in the opinion. Upon a re-examination of the record and briefs the court is satisfied that the judgment heretofore ordered is the correct one to be entered, and the opinion as filed on February 26, 1914, is, as to its main text, readopted as follows:
“This action was brought to recover damages occasioned by the death of one Nick Shannas, which was alleged to have been caused…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Judson v. LyfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Abbey Homestead Ass'n v. WillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Lunnun v. MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Bedan v. TurneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Couson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Calexico Lumber Co. v. EmersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Bonner v. LehfeldtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Tannahill v. GreeningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927