Application of John S. Bozek
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
This is an appeal from the Patent Office Board of Appeals decision, adhered to on reconsideration, which affirmed the rejection of claims 2, 4, 5, 7, and 9-14 in appellant’s application, 1 as unpatenta ble over Speidel 2 in view of Henchert 3 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The board reversed the rejection of three claims.
The Invention
As stated in appellant’s specification, the invention relates to “a can end of the easy opening type adapted for the dispensing of beverages including beer, wherein an end panel of the can end is provided with a score line which defines a tearout portion…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Application of Hans Theodor BoeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Application of George C. MapelsdenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- In re HenleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Sang-Su LeeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Dystar Textilfarben Gmbh & Co Deutschland Kg v. C.H. Patrick, Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Perfect Web Technologies, Inc. v. InfoUSA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- In re WoodCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Smiths Industries Medical Systems, Inc., as Successor of Intertech Resources Inc. v. Vital Signs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.