Legal Opinion

In re Henley

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 30, 1956No. 6221PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, Chief Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the holding of the Primary Examiner rejecting as unpatentable over the prior art claim 4, the only remaining claim in appellant’s application for a patent on a “Clothes Closet Pole.”

The features of the alleged invention are readily apparent from a consideration of claim 4, which reads as follows:

A clothes closet pole assembly comprising an extensible rod, and means disposed at each end of said rod for supporting said rod, said means comprising a *702hanger including a bracket having a cnp…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re VoitCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  2. In re TwomeyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Application of John S. BozekCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  2. In re AttwoodCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  3. Application of George C. MapelsdenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  4. Application of George P. CochranCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  5. Application of Charles W. AttwoodCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API