Legal Opinion

State v. Hampton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 24, 1978No. 121PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Justice.

Defendant contends that the trial judge committed prejudicial error by permitting the witness Davis to testify as to what he told the police. The witness was asked, “What did you tell the officers?” He replied, “I told them what Joe had told me to tell them, that Cleveland Wilson had took us to Greystone and left us.” Defendant contends that this is hearsay evidence. We disagree.

In 1 Stansbury’s North Carolina Evidence, Section 138, pp. 459-460 (Brandis Rev. 1973), it. is stated:. . . [W]henever the assertion of any person, other than that of the witness himself in his present…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. Marshall Norman HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. State v. . BensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. State v. WynnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. AbrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. PimentalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. VickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  4. State v. DiazSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API