Legal Opinion
Carmelo Raul Haynes v. G. Biaggini
District Court, C.D. California
Decided October 16, 2019No. 2:16-cv-01949Unknown
1Opinion
O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California 10 11 CARMELO RAUL HAYNES, Case No: 2:16-cv-01949-ODW (JEMx) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. REQUEST FOR A TEMPORARY 14 RESTRAINING ORDER [39] G BIAGGINI et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Request for a Temporary Restraining 19 Order to prevent Plaintiff from facing retaliation by Defendants. (TRO 1, 20 ECF No. 39.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES the TRO. 21 II. BACKGROUND 22 Carmelo Haynes, Plaintiff in pro se, filed suit…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc., a California Corporation, D/B/A Sisco v. John D. Brush and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Shell Offshore, Inc. v. Greenpeace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.