Legal Opinion

Wood v. Bresnahan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1886PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Muskegon. (Russell, J.) Replevin. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChahplin, J.

Replevin for one Bay State steam-engine, and band-wheel to same, one Perkins shingle-machine, and one Climax gummer.

The defendant, as sheriff of the county of Muskegon, had seized these articles by virtue of a writ of attachment placed in his hands in a suit wherein a certain creditor of Wood was plaintiff and he was defendant. The property above specified was appraised in the attachment suit as follows:

“One Bay State steam-engine and fly-wheel, $200; one shingle-machine, $40; one saw-gummer, $10.”

At the time the defendaut seized this property he levied upon other machinery; the whole…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. O'Donnell v. SegarMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. McHugh v. CurtisMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Grimestad v. LofgrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  2. Harris v. TownleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Smith v. RoadsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Boyle v. WalshMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Dean v. ShephardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API