Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Williams Ex Rel. Estate of Martinez v. Town of Silver City

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided September 22, 1972No. 885Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSutin, Judge

(partially concurring, and dissenting).

I concur in that part of the result of the majority opinion which reverses the judgment n. o. v. I dissent because a new trial was granted defendant. The judgment for plaintiffs should be reinstated.

This tragedy occurred almost five years ago. The delay in retrying this case will have adverse effects on both parties. Experience teaches that the glow of a trial fades when the burdens of the courtroom repeat themselves.

The majority opinion grants a new trial on a trivial, legal question consisting of a phrase in an instruction admitted by defendant to be…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Williamson v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Hildreth v. KeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Jewell v. SeidenbergNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API