State v. Zimmerman
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Leavenworth District Court. Information for libel. The ruling and judgment complained of by The State, and the facts, appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
This was an information for libel, instituted by Nicholas Zimmerman, as prosecutor, against Michael Eeinish. Upon the trial the jury found and returned the following verdict:
“We, the jury, impaneled and sworn in the above entitled case, do, upon our oaths, find the defendant not guilty; and we do further find that this prosecution was instituted by Nicholas Zimmerman without probable cause, and from malicious motives.
O. S. Hiatt, Foreman.’1’
Upon motion of the prosecuting witness, Zimmerman, the trial court set aside so much of the verdict…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Paxton v. WoodwardMontana Supreme Court · 1904
- State v. BlandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- State v. MarekSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
- State v. HeacockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.