Legal Opinion
PENN. THRESHERMEN &C. INS. CO. v. Gardner
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 7, 1963No. 39913PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
107 Ga. App. 472 (1963)
130 S.E.2d 507
PENNSYLVANIA THRESHERMEN & FARMERS MUTUAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
v.
GARDNER et al.
39913.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Decided March 7, 1963.
Sharpe & Sharpe, T. Malone Sharpe, T. Ross Sharpe, for plaintiff in error.
Perry Brannen, Allen & Edenfield, contra.
CARLISLE, Presiding Judge.
1. Where there exists a controversy within the meaning of the Declaratory Judgments Act (Code Ann. § 110-1101), parties to a policy of automobile liability insurance may invoke this remedy for determination of controversies arising from the construction and operation of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Calvary Independent Baptist Church v. City of RomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Brown v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Darnell v. TateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Cook v. SikesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- International Indemnity Co. v. BlakeyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- West v. Judicial CouncilCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Chatham County Board of Assessors v. JepsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003