Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mallory

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 16, 1992No. 2854PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge.

The Commonwealth appeals the grant of a motion to suppress by the appellee, Robert Mallory. 1 We reverse.

The facts of record are undisputed and indicate that at approximately 1:45 p.m., on the 3rd day of March, 1989, plainclothes officers under the direction of Lieutenant Samuel Lynch of the Philadelphia Police Department established a surveillance in the vicinity of 1308 East Price Street, Philadelphia. This action was taken because of numerous accounts received by the police that drug activity was taking place in the 1300 block of East Price Street.

After fifteen minutes at…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BurnsideSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Quarles v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. In the Interest of B.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. RosenfeltSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API