Legal Opinion

Wetenhall v. Chas. S. Mabrey Constr. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1930No. Docket No. S.F. 13312PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

— This appeal by the defendants from a judgment entered on the pleadings presents the question whether or not an individual doing business as such, and using his own name and initials, followed by the word “Company,” is required to file with the clerk of the county and publish the certificate required by sections 2466 and 2468 of the Civil Code. On petition to this court, after decision and judgment in the District Court of Appeal, it was contended that the decisions on the subject were not uniform, in that an opposite vieiv to that expressed by the decision in this case had been reached by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Carlock v. CagnacciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Pendleton v. ClineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. McLean v. CrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Andrews v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Nicholson v. Auburn Gold Mining & Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vagim v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Levelon Builders, Inc. v. LynnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Painless Parker v. Board of Dental Exam.California Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API