Legal Opinion · Dissent
Painless Parker v. Board of Dental Exam.
California Supreme Court
Decided September 1, 1932No. Docket No. S.F. 14394Published
1Dissent
LANGDON, J., Dissenting.
I dissent and adopt the opinion of the District Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Two, as an expression of my views. The opinion of that court written by Mr. Presiding Justice Nourse is as follows:
“This is an appeal from a judgment affirming an order of the dental board suspending petitioner’s license to practice dentistry.
“The petitioner was tried by the dental board upon an information framed in four counts charging unprofessional conduct. The first count charged petitioner with aiding and abetting the corporation Painless Parker Dentist to practice…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Louis K. Liggett Co. v. BaldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- The Pocket Veto CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- People v. Merchants Protective Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Ex Parte WhitleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People Ex Rel. Los Angeles Bar Ass'n v. California Protective Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1926
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.